On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 23:16 +0000, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> Is there any update on the necessity of this init script, James?
>
> I was considering sponsoring the patch that adds the status action. The
> whole init script can be removed subsequently, if that's the best course
> of action thereafter...
I say go for it. No harm in having a status action as long as we have
an init script. Last I heard we were probably going to keep it anyway.
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 23:16 +0000, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> Is there any update on the necessity of this init script, James?
>
> I was considering sponsoring the patch that adds the status action. The
> whole init script can be removed subsequently, if that's the best course
> of action thereafter...
I say go for it. No harm in having a status action as long as we have
an init script. Last I heard we were probably going to keep it anyway.
Thanks,
James