Note: I'm posting this here because it seems like all the good commentary is over here. IMHO, having 42555 be marked a duplicate of 33394, rather than the reverse, could be construed as information hiding - everyone points people to the bug that isn't marked as a duplicate, and that bug only has a few comments and no insightful, technical discussion. It's yet another way of ensuring that this problem gets no priority, despite its need.
Incidentally, I looked at the blueprint linked above, and there does not appear to be anything there yet...
Fixing this is now brainstorm idea 9517 (http:// brainstorm. ubuntu. com/idea/ 9517).
Note: I'm posting this here because it seems like all the good commentary is over here. IMHO, having 42555 be marked a duplicate of 33394, rather than the reverse, could be construed as information hiding - everyone points people to the bug that isn't marked as a duplicate, and that bug only has a few comments and no insightful, technical discussion. It's yet another way of ensuring that this problem gets no priority, despite its need.
Incidentally, I looked at the blueprint linked above, and there does not appear to be anything there yet...