On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 12:19:58AM -0000, Evan Carroll wrote:
> So the deal for the flash users, is we're not supposed to be using
> flashplugin-installer. That's dead.
No, it isn't. The referenced link says that it is no longer supported by
Chrome, but that doesn't mean flashplugin-installer is dead. The plugin
works with firefox; the flashplugin-installer package successfully downloads
the file and the warning message mentioned in this bug report is just a
warning.
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 12:19:58AM -0000, Evan Carroll wrote: installer. That's dead.
> So the deal for the flash users, is we're not supposed to be using
> flashplugin-
No, it isn't. The referenced link says that it is no longer supported by installer is dead. The plugin installer package successfully downloads
Chrome, but that doesn't mean flashplugin-
works with firefox; the flashplugin-
the file and the warning message mentioned in this bug report is just a
warning.