Thanks Seth,
these tpm things are rather new so exposure to testing is low in general.
You are right, but I think we do not only need what you spotted.
I'll try to prepare this so that someone else review and ack (or disagree). None of this needs a FFe IMHO all just fixes - we'll want to hold back the actual upload until beta-freeze is over, but that does not prevent to prepare the fixes.
Thanks Seth,
these tpm things are rather new so exposure to testing is low in general.
You are right, but I think we do not only need what you spotted.
In fact while reading this I found that upstream (Thanks Stefan) maintains great stable branches. /github. com/stefanberge r/libtpms/ releases/ tag/v0. 9.1 /github. com/stefanberge r/libtpms/ releases/ tag/v0. 9.2 /github. com/stefanberge r/libtpms/ releases/ tag/v0. 9.3
I think we should consider taking in
- https:/
- https:/
- https:/
- plus the patch you've found
- a ppc64 build fix from debian / upstream #297
I'll try to prepare this so that someone else review and ack (or disagree). None of this needs a FFe IMHO all just fixes - we'll want to hold back the actual upload until beta-freeze is over, but that does not prevent to prepare the fixes.
In addition to reduce delta one day I filed: /github. com/stefanberge r/libtpms/ pull/305
- https:/
I have prepared that in: /launchpad. net/~paelzer/ +archive/ ubuntu/ libtpms- jammy-0. 9.3 /code.launchpad .net/~paelzer/ ubuntu/ +source/ libtpms/ +git/libtpms/ +merge/ 417854
PPA: https:/
MR: https:/
P.S. this will also resolve the fact that it is - so far - missing on ppc64
Please anyone review and/or consume it from that PPA and let me know if you are +1 on an upload of that.