Log in / Register
Ubuntu
swfdec-mozilla package
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #330309
Comment #4
Comment 4 for bug 330309
Revision history for this message
Alexander Sack (asac)
wrote
on 2009-02-24
:
#4
I would say its rather swfdec than gnash as that is known to eat more resources / CPU cycles.
I would say its rather swfdec than gnash as that is known to eat more resources / CPU cycles.
I would say its rather swfdec than gnash as that is known to eat more resources / CPU cycles.