Comment 24 for bug 1594740

After carefully rereading @nacc's question I realized I missed an essential detail ("does it end up using the same systemd file"). I believe this is indeed the case, as intended (I assume?).

Here's what I get after a clean install of the fixed package:

peter@mbp> ls -ld /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/supervisor.service
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 Mar 13 23:53 /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/supervisor.service -> /lib/systemd/system/supervisor.service

Here's what I get after upgrading from the buggy version to the fixed version:

peter@mbp> ls -ld /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/supervisor.service
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 Mar 13 23:55 /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/supervisor.service -> /lib/systemd/system/supervisor.service

The target of the symlink is the same in both cases. The timestamps differ but that's just the creation time of the symlink AFAIK (from the moment 'systemctl enable' or an equivalent command is invoked).