Message-Id: <1114527199.30864.0.camel@vertex>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:53:19 -0400
From: John McCutchan <email address hidden>
To: Florian Weimer <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#282468: subversion: second
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 09:00 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * John McCutchan:
>
> > On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 08:50 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> What is the proper umask? It's different for different people. Can't
> >> you use the FSFS backend and set proper repository permissions so that
> >> the umask doesn't matter?
> >
> > The proper umask is 002.
>
> Even if adduser/homedir-permission is true?
Huh?
>
> > That might not work for EVERYONE, but for the vast majority 002 is
> > correct.
>
> So why it's not the system default? 8-)
Because what works best for /svnroot doesn't work best for all
directories!
Message-Id: <1114527199. 30864.0. camel@vertex>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:53:19 -0400
From: John McCutchan <email address hidden>
To: Florian Weimer <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#282468: subversion: second
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 09:00 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: homedir- permission is true?
> * John McCutchan:
>
> > On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 08:50 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> What is the proper umask? It's different for different people. Can't
> >> you use the FSFS backend and set proper repository permissions so that
> >> the umask doesn't matter?
> >
> > The proper umask is 002.
>
> Even if adduser/
Huh?
>
> > That might not work for EVERYONE, but for the vast majority 002 is
> > correct.
>
> So why it's not the system default? 8-)
Because what works best for /svnroot doesn't work best for all
directories!
--
John McCutchan <email address hidden>