Ubuntu
subversion package

  1. Bug #10560
  2. Comment #23

Comment 23 for bug 10560

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-Id: <1114448005.11732.3.camel@vertex>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 12:53:25 -0400
From: John McCutchan <email address hidden>
To: Florian Weimer <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#282468: subversion: second

On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 08:50 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> What is the proper umask? It's different for different people. Can't
> you use the FSFS backend and set proper repository permissions so that
> the umask doesn't matter?

The proper umask is 002. That might not work for EVERYONE, but for the
vast majority 002 is correct. I did not know about FSFS backend, I will
look into it. Maybe the FSFS backend should be made default for Debian?

--
John McCutchan <email address hidden>