Comment 1 for bug 1101978

Revision history for this message
Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) wrote :

MIR review:

 * Does it FTBFS currently? build fine
 * Does it have a test suite? yes. 'Automated tests: no'
 * Does Ubuntu carry a delta? we have a delta, but it is so that we have a newer version
 * If it's a library, does it either have a symbols file or use an empty argument to dh_makeshlibs -V? has a symbols file
 * Does it have a watch file? yes
 * Is its update history slow or sporadic? it is fairly slow, but not unacceptably so
 * Is the current release packaged? no. 0.12.2 is available in Debian experimental
 * Will entering main make it harder for the people currently keeping it up to date? not really, the server team is taking care of it
 * Lintian clean
 * debian/rules is clean
 * Errors/warnings during the build (audit-log.sh <logfile>)
  * has the following compiler warnings. should fix these:
backtrace.c:81:16: warning: ignoring return value of 'seteuid', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
lz_compress_tmpl.c:486:18: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
lz_compress_tmpl.c:486:18: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
lz_compress_tmpl.c:486:18: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
lz_compress_tmpl.c:486:18: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
lz_compress_tmpl.c:486:18: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
lz_compress_tmpl.c:486:18: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
 * Incautious use of malloc/sprintf: server is ok
 * Uses of sudo (see audit-packaging.sh) or LD_LIBRARY_PATH (see audit-code.sh): no
 * Important bugs (crashers, etc) in Debian or Ubuntu: none