Ubuntu
spamprobe package

  1. Bug #1882418
  2. Comment #8

Comment 8 for bug 1882418

Revision history for this message
Joseph Ishac (jishac) wrote :

I believe I have corrected the issue. I would propose that this minor patch be tested by others impacted. It seems to clean up the issue by simply adding some missing return codes (and I happened to fix a few types that compiler was complaining about as well).

The changes seem to make the compiler and optimizer happy.