On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Kamus <email address hidden> wrote:
> Josh, which version of banshee/Ubuntu are you using?
>
> ** Changed in: banshee (Ubuntu)
> Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784824
>
> Title:
> Banshee BPM detection is horrendous
>
> Status in “banshee” package in Ubuntu:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: banshee
>
> I'm really not sure what can be done about it, but the BPM detection
> feature is extremely happy to give a lot of up beat songs a BPM under
> 50, and it just generally doesn't know what its talking about. This is
> probably more under wishlist than bug, but since there's no attempt at
> Genius style stuff on Banshee, this is the closest thing and it would
> be nice if it worked better.
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/784824/+subscribe
>
2.0.0
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Kamus <email address hidden> wrote:
> Josh, which version of banshee/Ubuntu are you using? /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 784824 /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ banshee/ +bug/784824/ +subscribe
>
> ** Changed in: banshee (Ubuntu)
> Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> Banshee BPM detection is horrendous
>
> Status in “banshee” package in Ubuntu:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: banshee
>
> I'm really not sure what can be done about it, but the BPM detection
> feature is extremely happy to give a lot of up beat songs a BPM under
> 50, and it just generally doesn't know what its talking about. This is
> probably more under wishlist than bug, but since there's no attempt at
> Genius style stuff on Banshee, this is the closest thing and it would
> be nice if it worked better.
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https:/
>
--
Sincerely,
Josh