well, sorry for the last one, was clearly too long and a bit off-topic here.
But i was nearly angry.
I was expecting free software (ue/micro-emacs) and had to face a _shareware_
nag (*HU !*).
About "hacky hack" and infrastructures, i see two (well proof) solutions,
1. Repos (pool/shareware here)
2. naming convention (avoiding miss interpretation)
I got a nag and didn't like it !
Don't get me wrong, even if im against "shareware" (witch in fact, are mostly
"time-restricted-ware", having little in common with sharing (terminological))
i can consider "the need" of such a repos.
Canonical (with Ubuntu) has clearly done (and still do) a HUGE job in spreading
FREE software and sources, but i also think that the time has come for Ubuntu
to consider a way to track freedom and commerce ... in separated ways.
@ Matthew Paul Thomas
well, sorry for the last one, was clearly too long and a bit off-topic here.
But i was nearly angry.
I was expecting free software (ue/micro-emacs) and had to face a _shareware_
nag (*HU !*).
About "hacky hack" and infrastructures, i see two (well proof) solutions,
1. Repos (pool/shareware here)
2. naming convention (avoiding miss interpretation)
I got a nag and didn't like it !
Don't get me wrong, even if im against "shareware" (witch in fact, are mostly restricted- ware", having little in common with sharing (terminological))
"time-
i can consider "the need" of such a repos.
Canonical (with Ubuntu) has clearly done (and still do) a HUGE job in spreading
FREE software and sources, but i also think that the time has come for Ubuntu
to consider a way to track freedom and commerce ... in separated ways.
Sincerly.