Thanks Jamie, I've added snapd to this bug. Given that it's blocking me, I happily volunteer to work on it.
Just please confirm that my understanding is correct: it will be a new interface, whose slot will be implemented in snapd itself, and snaps willing to use the auto-activation feature will have to declare a plug with a parameter describing the service file to be installed (the name of the service can be found inside the .service file). Is this correct?
Thanks Jamie, I've added snapd to this bug. Given that it's blocking me, I happily volunteer to work on it.
Just please confirm that my understanding is correct: it will be a new interface, whose slot will be implemented in snapd itself, and snaps willing to use the auto-activation feature will have to declare a plug with a parameter describing the service file to be installed (the name of the service can be found inside the .service file). Is this correct?