Is IBM going to package this and maintain it in Debian?
And then Ubuntu can then sync this package from Debian.
Ubuntu defaults to net.ipv6.bindv6only=0 and we will not switch the default to 1.
Advising to use such a sysctl is actively harmful.
Why not advise users to use setsockopt IPV6_V6ONLY option instead? https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3493#section-5.3
and can be done transparently in the preload library.
Why doesn't AF_SMC support IPv6? It seems quite archaic.
Using a preload library, and advising to use preload library feels a bit dodgy to me. But that's just my personal opinion that preload libraries should only be used in testsuites.
Is IBM going to package this and maintain it in Debian?
And then Ubuntu can then sync this package from Debian.
Ubuntu defaults to net.ipv6. bindv6only= 0 and we will not switch the default to 1. /tools. ietf.org/ html/rfc3493# section- 5.3
Advising to use such a sysctl is actively harmful.
Why not advise users to use setsockopt IPV6_V6ONLY option instead? https:/
and can be done transparently in the preload library.
Why doesn't AF_SMC support IPv6? It seems quite archaic.
Using a preload library, and advising to use preload library feels a bit dodgy to me. But that's just my personal opinion that preload libraries should only be used in testsuites.