Ok, tested with 6.6, which didn't make much of a difference as I had already updated my drivedb.h to the version found in the 6.6 version. I suspect the issue is due to this line in the database:
As you can see, presumably there exist rules for the model, but the identifier is formatted differently than mine. I will fill n upstream bug report to signal this.
Ok, tested with 6.6, which didn't make much of a difference as I had already updated my drivedb.h to the version found in the 6.6 version. I suspect the issue is due to this line in the database:
"Micron_ 1100_MTFDDA[ KV](256| 512|1T0| 2T0)TBN| " // Marvell 88SS1074, tested Micron_ 1100_MTFDDAK256 TBN/M0MU020
As you can see, presumably there exist rules for the model, but the identifier is formatted differently than mine. I will fill n upstream bug report to signal this.