This bug was fixed in the package slim - 1.3.2-1
--------------- slim (1.3.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release. (Closes: #633583, #605214) * Update debian/control. - Bump up Standards-Version to 3.9.2. - Change Build-Depends from libjpeg62-dev to libjpeg-dev. (Closes: #644805) - Change Build-Depends from libpng12-dev to libpng-dev. * Fefresh patches. - Drop patches/ftbfs_gcc_4.4.patch. Applied to upstream. - Drop patches/xauth_secret_support.patch. Applied to upstream. - Drop patches/insecure_PATH_assignment.patch. Applied to upstream. - Drop patches/fix-manpage.patch. Applied to upstream. - Update patches/Makefile.patch and debian/patches/slim-conf.patch. - Add patches/fix_ftbfs_as-needed.patch. Fix build failure with ld --as-needed. (Closes: #607185) * Update debian/rules. - Fix lintian debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-{arch,indep}. * Update debian/README.Debian. - Fix lintian spelling-error-in-readme-debian.
-- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <email address hidden> Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:53:36 +0900
This bug was fixed in the package slim - 1.3.2-1
---------------
slim (1.3.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release. (Closes: #633583, #605214) ftbfs_gcc_ 4.4.patch. Applied to upstream. xauth_secret_ support. patch. Applied to upstream. insecure_ PATH_assignment .patch. Applied to upstream. fix-manpage. patch. Applied to upstream. Makefile. patch and debian/ patches/ slim-conf. patch. fix_ftbfs_ as-needed. patch. rules-missing- recommended- target build-{arch,indep}. README. Debian. error-in- readme- debian.
* Update debian/control.
- Bump up Standards-Version to 3.9.2.
- Change Build-Depends from libjpeg62-dev to libjpeg-dev. (Closes: #644805)
- Change Build-Depends from libpng12-dev to libpng-dev.
* Fefresh patches.
- Drop patches/
- Drop patches/
- Drop patches/
- Drop patches/
- Update patches/
- Add patches/
Fix build failure with ld --as-needed. (Closes: #607185)
* Update debian/rules.
- Fix lintian debian-
* Update debian/
- Fix lintian spelling-
-- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <email address hidden> Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:53:36 +0900