-----Forwarded Message-----
From: Mohammed Elzubeir <email address hidden>
To: Documentation and Translation <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: [URGENT] Debian Installer: Bug#272136: countrychooser: db_go f=
ails when choosing Arabic as language
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 12:11:41 +0400
On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 11:50, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Hmmm, diacritics indeed modify another character, right?
>=20
Not really. A diacritic like a 'SHADDA' for example, would be displayed
on top of a character's glyph. The result would "look" as if it's a
different character but it's not. In reality, what the shadda means is
the equivalent of repeating the character (e.g. alarabiYYa -- in Arabic,
instead of having two Y's you would have a Y and a shadda on top of it).
> This means that combining a character and a diacritic would give a
> different character. The combination is done by the shaping code and
> thus the final character is indeed not present in the original file,
> right?
>=20
No, the shaping code is not involved in this process. Shaping only
concerns itself with what glyph to use to represent a character,
depending on its position -- diacritics is out of its scope.
> If that is true, this means that the needed characters (the rsult of
> the combination of harakat and the original character) should be in
> the needed-characters/ar file as well probably as the standalone
> harakat.
Harakat are those guys U+064B - U+0652
>=20
> Could you complete the "ar" file I originally sent so that it includes
> harakat as well as combined characters (if I'm not wrong above) ?
>=20
Sure -- but first, I can't seem to figure out what that last character
is in that file. Can anyone tell me what it is? (looks very strange
LAM+ALEF with 'something' else there..)
Regards,
Mohammed Elzubeir
________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Doc mailing list
<email address hidden> http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/doc
--=-C1T9+N+Jyh6jGc+45M5X
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Message-Id: <1095581753. 1345.16. camel@localhost >
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 12:15:53 +0400
From: Mohammed Elzubeir <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [URGENT] Debian Installer: Bug#272136: countrychooser:
db_go fails when choosing Arabic as language]
--=-C1T9+ N+Jyh6jGc+ 45M5X Transfer- Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-
-----Forwarded Message-----
From: Mohammed Elzubeir <email address hidden>
To: Documentation and Translation <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: [URGENT] Debian Installer: Bug#272136: countrychooser: db_go f=
ails when choosing Arabic as language
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 12:11:41 +0400
On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 11:50, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Hmmm, diacritics indeed modify another character, right?
>=20
Not really. A diacritic like a 'SHADDA' for example, would be displayed
on top of a character's glyph. The result would "look" as if it's a
different character but it's not. In reality, what the shadda means is
the equivalent of repeating the character (e.g. alarabiYYa -- in Arabic,
instead of having two Y's you would have a Y and a shadda on top of it).
> This means that combining a character and a diacritic would give a
> different character. The combination is done by the shaping code and
> thus the final character is indeed not present in the original file,
> right?
>=20
No, the shaping code is not involved in this process. Shaping only
concerns itself with what glyph to use to represent a character,
depending on its position -- diacritics is out of its scope.
> If that is true, this means that the needed characters (the rsult of characters/ ar file as well probably as the standalone
> the combination of harakat and the original character) should be in
> the needed-
> harakat.
Harakat are those guys U+064B - U+0652
>=20
> Could you complete the "ar" file I originally sent so that it includes
> harakat as well as combined characters (if I'm not wrong above) ?
>=20
Sure -- but first, I can't seem to figure out what that last character
is in that file. Can anyone tell me what it is? (looks very strange
LAM+ALEF with 'something' else there..)
Regards,
Mohammed Elzubeir
_______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ __ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _____ lists.arabeyes. org/mailman/ listinfo/ doc
_______
Doc mailing list
<email address hidden>
http://
--=-C1T9+ N+Jyh6jGc+ 45M5X pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Type: application/
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
h8P9Q4KQRAjBvAJ 9/zeGv/ N71VCxLq2NR3rsV AlyzSACggXL4 2Vgfj7yM=
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBBTUA51za
hoVtRiwyLBOXDJk
=MDUi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-C1T9+ N+Jyh6jGc+ 45M5X--