As mentioned in my preceding comment, while there will always be cases where the SecureBoot package may be removed and result in losing SB compatibility, when we know that the system has SB enabled we don't really want this to happen without warning to the user. Retitling this bug, which can be used to track this issue.
As mentioned in my preceding comment, while there will always be cases where the SecureBoot package may be removed and result in losing SB compatibility, when we know that the system has SB enabled we don't really want this to happen without warning to the user. Retitling this bug, which can be used to track this issue.