Comment 59 for bug 1833618
Revision history for this message
| Rafael David Tinoco (rafaeldtinoco) wrote | #59 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
Okay, so I discovered the upstream version is doing something "similar" to what I just proposed, but in a different and more complete way (not suitable for a SRU for example). I explained it here:
https:/
And, because of that, I'll probably go with my suggestion (or close to it) as a SRU for Eoan, but will keep it opened for F-series and tag this as server-next, as it will require more attention for the next release and sg3-utils merges.