Comment 14 for bug 34244

Revision history for this message
Dana Olson (adolson) wrote : Re: [Bug 34244] seq24 UVF request

On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 20:12 +0000, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> "If you decide not to approve, then I guess I will put all my eggs in
> the backport basket." - this sentence is completely unnecessary - if not
> supposed to be a threat, it still doesn't sound as good as "please
> consider this update as fix 123 is really important and it works better
> for all my friends too". Don't get me wrong - I admire your drive and
> determination, but this sentence doesn't really motivate.

Hi Daniel,
I understand. Sorry. It wasn't a threat though, just a statement as the
changelog isn't very helpful and no bug reports were opened, so we (I
think siretart and I, names are bad for me) talked on IRC about it, and
backports was the suggested method if no one could verify any bugs..
I've been in contact with the other two people that I know use it, and
they are very slow and unresponsive - yet they're the ones complaining
to me about old and buggy versions of software in Ubuntu. So I guess
they don't care *THAT* much.
Dana