On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 04:36:21PM -0000, cablop wrote:
> I think, we maybe must add this bug to KDE to.
I don't think so.
> Why?
> I was thinking in this bug for some time, and I think, if I can write
> the accents in the way I described earlier, then SCIM active works
> well with KDE, then, where's the problem? Not in SCIM itself, but in
> the way SCIM and KDE works when SCIM is NOT active.
As I've said above, it's a known bug in scim, and it doesn't happen for
the default settings in new gutsy installs.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 04:36:21PM -0000, cablop wrote:
> I think, we maybe must add this bug to KDE to.
I don't think so.
> Why?
> I was thinking in this bug for some time, and I think, if I can write
> the accents in the way I described earlier, then SCIM active works
> well with KDE, then, where's the problem? Not in SCIM itself, but in
> the way SCIM and KDE works when SCIM is NOT active.
As I've said above, it's a known bug in scim, and it doesn't happen for
the default settings in new gutsy installs.
Ming
2008.02.03