On 3/11/06, Ming Hua <email address hidden> wrote:
> Public bug report changed:
> https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/34282
>
> Comment:
> I agree that the docs in /usr/share/doc/scim requires a little too much
> of the understanding of the whole system and skills to change
> configurations for the users.
>
> The reason is those docs are mainly for Debian users. Debian systems
> usually have much more diversities, and the doc would be wrong if it
> just specify one method that only works for GNOME, for example.
> Therefore the doc has to cover all possible system configurations and
> can't avoid being a little vague (at least with my understanding and
> writing skills, I can't make it more clear).
>
> I agree "working out of the box" experience is a goal worth persuing for
> scim in ubuntu, of course. We just need more people working on this.
If you use the OpenOffice.org 2.0.2 m156 packages built for Dapper
Drake, shouldn't SCIM run fine 'out of the box' ?
Now, if you are trying to run the OpenOffice.org 2.0.2 built by the
official OOo homepage, then please check out this SCIM entry in the
Wiki:
https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/SCIM
Yes, it is not working out of the box.
But the gcc C++ ABI compatibility issue is not going away for a while
I am afraid.
Also, is this guide by Mr. Bass for Ubuntu Hoary still useful for Dapper Drake?
Ubuntu CJK Chinese Japanese Korean Input Guide www.mrbass. org/linux/ ubuntu/ scim/
http://
Regards,
-zero0w
On 3/11/06, Ming Hua <email address hidden> wrote: /launchpad. net/malone/ bugs/34282
> Public bug report changed:
> https:/
>
> Comment:
> I agree that the docs in /usr/share/doc/scim requires a little too much
> of the understanding of the whole system and skills to change
> configurations for the users.
>
> The reason is those docs are mainly for Debian users. Debian systems
> usually have much more diversities, and the doc would be wrong if it
> just specify one method that only works for GNOME, for example.
> Therefore the doc has to cover all possible system configurations and
> can't avoid being a little vague (at least with my understanding and
> writing skills, I can't make it more clear).
>
> I agree "working out of the box" experience is a goal worth persuing for
> scim in ubuntu, of course. We just need more people working on this.