Comment 4 for bug 2003201

Revision history for this message
Dave Jones (waveform) wrote :

> I'm willing to give this a try, and sponsor any additional uploads if needed.

Thanks!

> In the changelog I made two minor modifications:
>  - I removed the newline in between the names and their respective changelog entries. This may be personal preference, but I've never seen a newline separating those before.

Doh -- not sure what I was thinking there

> - "Removed patches obsoleted/merged by upstream:" and "Removed obsolete patches:" are certainly redundant, I've removed the latter.

Given Debian is the upstream the difference is certainly nebulous, but I could make a (weak) argument about whether Debian's action or our own had removed the need for the patch. Sometimes makes a difference in the more complex merges which is why the two headings are part of my merge template (which was originally copied from ... somewhere I've forgotten). Anyway, perfectly happy for people to simplify!