Comment 27 for bug 8241

(In reply to comment #26)
> If it was using 4/4 and you changed the +1 to a -1, would that not cause it to
> use 4/2, rather than 4/3?

No it was 4/4 before adding 1.
That's why I changed it from +1 to -1 so it would use 4/3 instead of 4/5