Comment 24 for bug 8241

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :

Based on that output, the code seems correct as-is. The sysfs numbering starts
from 0, and the /proc/bus/usb numbering starts from 1, so it adds 1 to the sysfs
value to get the procfs value.

What led you to the conclusion that it needed to be changed? Can you provide
more detail about the problem?