only a comment : why not renaming libsane1 to libsane ?
and from the debian report above:
" Renaming the package to libsane1 without adding a "provides" breaks that dependency and it seems
like merely adding the "provides" does not get them into a working order again."
@Jeremy
only a comment : why not renaming libsane1 to libsane ?
and from the debian report above:
" Renaming the package to libsane1 without adding a "provides" breaks that dependency and it seems
like merely adding the "provides" does not get them into a working order again."