Confirmed: I could recreate this
Medium: This is the universe version of samba not the main one; and also if this is just a default config problem then it's not a high; although I don't know enough Samba to know if it's really more serious.
I suspect there are multiple bugs here; the log.%m name suggests something is going wrong with the naming,
and the reference to /usr/sbin/smbd that doesn't exist suggests there is some larger scale package problem.
Confirmed: I could recreate this
Medium: This is the universe version of samba not the main one; and also if this is just a default config problem then it's not a high; although I don't know enough Samba to know if it's really more serious.
I suspect there are multiple bugs here; the log.%m name suggests something is going wrong with the naming,
and the reference to /usr/sbin/smbd that doesn't exist suggests there is some larger scale package problem.
Dave