You're right, KDE should be blamed for misconfiguring samba.
But samba should kindfully ignore OBVIOUS misconfiguration! (Or would "no" ever be judged a valid network path to a CIFS share?)
You're right, KDE should be blamed for misconfiguring samba.
But samba should kindfully ignore OBVIOUS misconfiguration!
(Or would "no" ever be judged a valid network path to a CIFS share?)