Comment 10 for bug 1915674
Revision history for this message
| 8765pu (8765pukxbhc876y-deactivatedaccount) wrote | #10 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
a60fb26
(Get the code!)
Well, I don't know much about how bug statuses are used. As I see it you don't need more info from me so I'm going to assume that the status definitions aren't accurate here.
What does "incomplete" mean? And "won't fix"?
Does "won't fix" include:
- Not putting any pressure on samba to make things configurable?
- Not considering a more configurable alternative?
- Not considering using user accounts more conservatively for things they were presumably not intended (at least according to samba), or at least with non-common names?
It appears Samba does not agree with the the purpose to which you've put user accounts, or they would've made this easily configurable. As it is now, according to the info in this thread, samba's view seems to be that every single user account is relevant for file sharing, I.e. every single user account is backed by a real person. Sounds a bit optimistic.