Which also didn't land yet.
Therefore the prerequisite to make this really useful isn't ready yet (even 3 years later) :-/
On the positive side, some zfs forks have picked it up and there was a statement that main-zfs wants to consume it as well.
But then - this dependency tail is endless - they are stating that the kernel work isn't acceptable by upstream.
Hi, /github. com/openzfs/ zfs/pull/ 7728 /github. com/openzfs/ zfs/pull/ 9709
I'm coming by old cases trying to ensure we can re-assess those which are unblocked by now.
https:/
later became
https:/
Which also didn't land yet.
Therefore the prerequisite to make this really useful isn't ready yet (even 3 years later) :-/
On the positive side, some zfs forks have picked it up and there was a statement that main-zfs wants to consume it as well.
But then - this dependency tail is endless - they are stating that the kernel work isn't acceptable by upstream.
From there you then find the newest being: /github. com/openzfs/ zfs/pull/ 13186
https:/
Which is active and ongoing, so maybe this lands in zfs soon'ish and once available there then makes sense to reconsider enabling in our samba builds.