Comment 4 for bug 1583324

Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Ah, looks like a different behaviour between testparm and samba-tool testparm:

root@xenial-samba-include:~# testparm -s &>/dev/null; echo $?
0
root@xenial-samba-include:~# samba-tool testparm; echo $?
ERROR: Unable to load default file
255