Comment 2 for bug 146367

It seems that it was not included into samba fixes. I have also added comment to:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4268

Actually after further investigations, samba it looks like samba still calculates posix acls a bit differently from native system.

This patch solved my problem with executables, but I still get some unexpected permissions (I can live with them...). Maybe someone who really knows how POSIX acls works, could have a look at samba posix acl handling.

And sorry, I put incorrect link to the patch. I used corrected version.