------- Comment From <email address hidden> 2022-11-03 04:35 EDT-------
(In reply to comment #16)
> Packaging side, LGTM.
>
> However, I'm a bit skeptical at the patch itself, as it technically removes
> a feature. Do we have an analysis of why it's OK to remove the `block:`
> entries? I'm not too familiar with the ecosystem, so wouldn't it possible to
> have a focal userspace running on an older kernel that still presents the
> old way in its sysfs?
According to what i found,
this was deprecated in 2006 and can be re-enabled again in kernel with
CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED but then a lot of udev tools will break.
------- Comment From <email address hidden> 2022-11-03 04:35 EDT-------
(In reply to comment #16)
> Packaging side, LGTM.
>
> However, I'm a bit skeptical at the patch itself, as it technically removes
> a feature. Do we have an analysis of why it's OK to remove the `block:`
> entries? I'm not too familiar with the ecosystem, so wouldn't it possible to
> have a focal userspace running on an older kernel that still presents the
> old way in its sysfs?
According to what i found, SYSFS_DEPRECATE D but then a lot of udev tools will break.
this was deprecated in 2006 and can be re-enabled again in kernel with
CONFIG_
https:/ /elixir. bootlin. com/linux/ latest/ source/ init/Kconfig# L1287 /cateee. net/lkddb/ web-lkddb/ SYSFS_DEPRECATE D.html
https:/
Does s390x support such old kernels ?