Comment 6 for bug 1836862

Revision history for this message
Frank Heimes (fheimes) wrote :

After setting up a test disco LPAR with counters enabled in the activation profile I did a verification of the package - more a regression testing, since I only have access to z13 machine.
Anyway, I was able to use and run lscpumf, chcpumf and perf (using the old and then of course the new package from proposed) - I executed some samples and they all looked good, no issues, error or regressions found.
Hence adjusting disco tag ...