Comment 5 for bug 1053065

Lennart, thanks for your comments.

Yes, near as I can tell the s2tc package seems adequate to satisfy users expressed needs. It couldn't hurt to also have s3tc as an alternative if we see some definitive or measurable benefits, but sounds like there isn't data on hand at the moment to support that. In any case, even if we'd do that we'd still want s2tc in main as an alternative.

Didier, I see this has been assigned to you to review? Do you have any comments or reservations about this before adding it to main? I assume it will wait until after beta2 is out, which is fine.