Ubuntu
ruby2.0 package

  1. Bug #1310292
  2. Comment #17

Comment 17 for bug 1310292

Revision history for this message
Saku Ytti (ubuntu-ip) wrote :

What does "Won't Fix" mean for this LTS release?

Does it mean, there will not be, for lifetime of LTS, anyway 'ruby' would call version 2.0? If you want that to occur, you need to mangle symlinks yourself?

Isn't this regression? As 'ruby-switch' package did this in 13.10?

Could solution be, to reintroduce 'ruby-switch'?

What are we afraid that fixing this problem might break? Who could desire+depend on this newly introduced behavior? What type of use-case?