> This has been debated over and over again. > /usr/local/bin was rejected because the packaging and filesystem policy clashes.
I've found these previous discussions: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby1.8/+bug/145267 and http://fossplanet.com/f10/bug-448639-rubygems-fhs-compliance-debian-ubuntu-43888/
Where's the packaging and filesystem policy clash?
What's the purpose of /usr/local/bin if not for stuff like this. This way gem doesn't affect apt installed software and vice versa.
> This has been debated over and over again.
> /usr/local/bin was rejected because the packaging and filesystem policy clashes.
I've found these previous discussions: /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ ruby1.8/ +bug/145267 fossplanet. com/f10/ bug-448639- rubygems- fhs-compliance- debian- ubuntu- 43888/
https:/
and
http://
Where's the packaging and filesystem policy clash?
What's the purpose of /usr/local/bin if not for stuff like this.
This way gem doesn't affect apt installed software and vice versa.