Comment 8 for bug 1979128

Revision history for this message
Mitsuya Shibata (cosmos-door) wrote :

Attached is a debdiff file for bsfilter.

The only change is to add ruby-sdbm to Depends/Build-Depends to match the kinetic package, and to specify the package revision as in kinetic, but with 1.0.0 instead of 1.0.0-1 for lintian warnings. 1.0.0.0 instead of 1.0.0-1 for lintian warnings.

https://lintian.debian.org/tags/build-depends-on-1-revision

Is it ok to request SRU sponsor after ruby-sdbm moves from proposed to universe?