Ubuntu
rpl package

  1. Bug #1851378
  2. Comment #3

Comment 3 for bug 1851378

Revision history for this message
Benjamin Baez (benbaez4) wrote :

I got confused using rpl in 20.04, thanks to this page it is clarified. What was the reason changing to a different source? Using -R option in the original package was more reliable. SF.net version did not have issues while the Ubuntu version did.

aa0001@test:~/projects/biospectra/cvs$ find . -name '*.php' | xargs rpl -s "\$form->ACTION = \$conf['paths']['http'] . \$_SERVER['REQUEST_URI']" "\$form->ACTION = comHttpProtocolUrl( \$conf['paths']['serverName'] . \$_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'] )"

rpl: Simulating replacement of "$form->ACTION = $conf['paths']['http'] . $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI']" with "$form->ACTION = comHttpProtocolUrl( $conf['paths']['serverName'] . $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'] )" (case sensitive; partial words matched)

rpl: The files listed below would be modified in a replace operation

rpl: could not guess encoding; using locale default 'UTF-8'
  ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/rpl", line 377, in <module>
    matches = replace(f, o, regex, old_str, new_str, encoding)
  File "/usr/bin/rpl", line 178, in replace
    parts = regex.split(tonext + block)
TypeError: can only concatenate str (not "bytes") to str