- the debian/copyright is incomplete. an fgrep -ri copyright
shows missing copyright holders, although these might
not be extensive. Please also check for possible missing
copyright holders which are not covered by the simple
check above.
- host_applications/linux/apps/hello_pi/hello_video/README
not mentioned in d/copyright, and no license given. If the license
is not clear, it should be removed from the source package.
- having an upstream not caring about ABI stability is one thing,
however that's not what Ubuntu requires for main inclusion.
Especially for this, symbols files are required.
- libraspberrypi-bin.lintian-overrides says:
"The container binaries are undocumented and don't support -h
so I've no idea what they do".
How can we support these if we don't know what these do, and
why they are included?
- did you check for conflicting files in /usr/bin and /usr/include?
some names look pretty generic
things which should be fixed:
- the library packages should be marked as M-A: foreign
- there are a few (test?) binaries in /usr/bin, polluting the
name space, which don't even have man pages. Wouldn't it
be more appropriate to move those into some package
specific libdir?
raspberrypi- userland:
things which have to be fixed:
- the debian/copyright is incomplete. an fgrep -ri copyright
shows missing copyright holders, although these might
not be extensive. Please also check for possible missing
copyright holders which are not covered by the simple
check above.
- host_applicatio ns/linux/ apps/hello_ pi/hello_ video/README
not mentioned in d/copyright, and no license given. If the license
is not clear, it should be removed from the source package.
- having an upstream not caring about ABI stability is one thing,
however that's not what Ubuntu requires for main inclusion.
Especially for this, symbols files are required.
- libraspberrypi- bin.lintian- overrides says:
"The container binaries are undocumented and don't support -h
so I've no idea what they do".
How can we support these if we don't know what these do, and
why they are included?
- did you check for conflicting files in /usr/bin and /usr/include?
some names look pretty generic
things which should be fixed:
- the library packages should be marked as M-A: foreign
- there are a few (test?) binaries in /usr/bin, polluting the
name space, which don't even have man pages. Wouldn't it
be more appropriate to move those into some package
specific libdir?