On 02.04.2016 [00:33:53 -0000], Steve Langasek wrote:
> I'm going to disagree with the trivial approval here, because what's
> proposed is an update to a beta now and an SRU to a final release later.
> Will the delta between the beta and the final release be bugfix only,
> and thus fit our SRU policy? Is the time that will be required to do an
> SRU justifiable (for either the uploader or the SRU team), or is there a
> risk we will be left with a buggy beta package in the LTS instead?
I planned on spending my free time, if need be, to ensure the packages
got updated appropriately.
> roundcube+roundcube-plugins-extra are leaf packages, there's also the
> option to remove them rather than committing to an SRU.
I think we would need to drop roundcube-plugins-extra, as I'm not sure
if they are compatible with 1.2. I'll try to figure that out by
interacting with upstream and the Debian developers.
On 02.04.2016 [00:33:53 -0000], Steve Langasek wrote:
> I'm going to disagree with the trivial approval here, because what's
> proposed is an update to a beta now and an SRU to a final release later.
> Will the delta between the beta and the final release be bugfix only,
> and thus fit our SRU policy? Is the time that will be required to do an
> SRU justifiable (for either the uploader or the SRU team), or is there a
> risk we will be left with a buggy beta package in the LTS instead?
I planned on spending my free time, if need be, to ensure the packages
got updated appropriately.
> roundcube+ roundcube- plugins- extra are leaf packages, there's also the
> option to remove them rather than committing to an SRU.
I think we would need to drop roundcube- plugins- extra, as I'm not sure
if they are compatible with 1.2. I'll try to figure that out by
interacting with upstream and the Debian developers.