On 11/27/2010 09:02 AM, Thomas Egerer wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> the upstream HEAD revision is not affected by this problem any more. Plus: I had to amend my patch, I overlooked the free statement to s_track_num.
> To be honest, I didn't check the svn repo before posting here. The bug is still new while the fix is already applied to the upstream repo.
>
> Thomas
>
> ** Patch added: "Amended version of the revised fix for this bug"
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ripperx/+bug/514739/+attachment/1747091/+files/fix_2_digit_track_numbers.diff
>
Hi Thomas,
It appears that the latest upstream release will be part of the next Ubuntu
release [1].
On 11/27/2010 09:02 AM, Thomas Egerer wrote: /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ ripperx/ +bug/514739/ +attachment/ 1747091/ +files/ fix_2_digit_ track_numbers. diff
> Hi Tony,
>
> the upstream HEAD revision is not affected by this problem any more. Plus: I had to amend my patch, I overlooked the free statement to s_track_num.
> To be honest, I didn't check the svn repo before posting here. The bug is still new while the fix is already applied to the upstream repo.
>
> Thomas
>
> ** Patch added: "Amended version of the revised fix for this bug"
> https:/
>
Hi Thomas,
It appears that the latest upstream release will be part of the next Ubuntu
release [1].
Hopefully that resolves the issue for good.
Cheers,
tony
[1] http:// packages. ubuntu. com/natty/ ripperx