Thomas Hood wrote:
> interfaces(5):
>
> Read the passages on mapping.
Ok, point taken. It is much much more complicated than I believed. Guess I need to anticipate beyond Linux.
>> [...]
>> Would that break the system?
> And listing an obsolete nameserver address only has the effect of delaying the
> name service failure condition by a few seconds. These issues are minor
> compared with the problem of resolv.conf *lacking* nameserver addresses that
> *are* in the original file. That's what will bring the pitchfork-armed admins to our
> doors.
And since we talk about a specific case of upgrading really, either the addresses are already obsolete or not. So that should not make things really worse. I guess the conditional link-to-tail solution sounds like the way forward then.
Thanks for the reference to the other bug. That is handled over there then.
Thomas Hood wrote:
> interfaces(5):
>
> Read the passages on mapping.
Ok, point taken. It is much much more complicated than I believed. Guess I need to anticipate beyond Linux.
>> [...]
>> Would that break the system?
> And listing an obsolete nameserver address only has the effect of delaying the
> name service failure condition by a few seconds. These issues are minor
> compared with the problem of resolv.conf *lacking* nameserver addresses that
> *are* in the original file. That's what will bring the pitchfork-armed admins to our
> doors.
And since we talk about a specific case of upgrading really, either the addresses are already obsolete or not. So that should not make things really worse. I guess the conditional link-to-tail solution sounds like the way forward then.
Thanks for the reference to the other bug. That is handled over there then.