Thanks, the details help to understand the issue, I'm marking as confirmed. It's a multi-arch issue trying to install the armhf variant, which is different from the broken dependencies statement.
What's the usecase exactly to install the armhf version there when you already have the arm64 one?
It's a bug that should be fixed by understanding why it's problematic would help setting the importance
Thanks, the details help to understand the issue, I'm marking as confirmed. It's a multi-arch issue trying to install the armhf variant, which is different from the broken dependencies statement.
What's the usecase exactly to install the armhf version there when you already have the arm64 one?
It's a bug that should be fixed by understanding why it's problematic would help setting the importance