Ok, I am slightly confused here right now. From the comments I see that the current SRUs are not enough for the bug to be fixed, is that correct? Especially that I see debdiffs for bionic *and* focal attached.
Also, with so many different comments and issues regarding verification, I think I would need a bit more regarding what testing has been performed and on which packages (with logs perhaps). Just a "verified focal and groovy" is too ambiguous. For now I'm switching it back to 'verification-needed'.
As for all the additional debdiffs - I assume those also need to be included for the fix to be complete, yes? Are those changes already present in groovy?
Ok, I am slightly confused here right now. From the comments I see that the current SRUs are not enough for the bug to be fixed, is that correct? Especially that I see debdiffs for bionic *and* focal attached.
Also, with so many different comments and issues regarding verification, I think I would need a bit more regarding what testing has been performed and on which packages (with logs perhaps). Just a "verified focal and groovy" is too ambiguous. For now I'm switching it back to 'verification- needed' .
As for all the additional debdiffs - I assume those also need to be included for the fix to be complete, yes? Are those changes already present in groovy?