Comment 4 for bug 1500633

Revision history for this message
kevin gunn (kgunn72) wrote :

i see what you're saying technically, altho i think it does feel a little jarring.
At the same time this feels like a relatively low occurance for a user due to the specifics required
and it sounds like a tangled web, kind of complicating the sensor policy.
So i would say due to those factors, we can make this lower priority, but would like design to weigh in here.