Comment 11 for bug 1776189

Revision history for this message
Robie Basak (racb) wrote :

SRU review for Bionic.

This looks reasonable to me. I'm not so sure about the hardware enablement exception, but as a new feature it seems like something we'd want for an LTS anyway, and complies with all the SRU requirements under that exception. It's an entirely new machine type which isn't expected to impact anything existing.

I'm a little concerned that the feature hasn't had much time to age in Cosmic, so I suggest a longer aging period in bionic-proposed than normal for quality reasons, since normally when we backport a feature it is already well established in the development release or upstream.