On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 01:44:55AM +0700, Sikon wrote:
> Can you please explain why you're maintaining two completely different
> libraries (QCA1 for Qt3 and QCA2 for Qt4) as the same source package?
Feel free to comment there, as well (mailto:<email address hidden>).
BTW, is mailing to <bug-number>@bugs.launchpad.net sufficient to add
comments to ubuntu bugs? I sent a Cc: of my last mail to
<email address hidden>, but it didn't yet show up on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qca/+bug/128505, so I wonder
if I missed something.
The answer was:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 01:44:55AM +0700, Sikon wrote:
> Can you please explain why you're maintaining two completely different
> libraries (QCA1 for Qt3 and QCA2 for Qt4) as the same source package?
Because I think we should agree on a common packaging soon, I opened a bugs.debian. org/cgi- bin/bugreport. cgi?bug= 435185
bug on the debian bts as well:
http://
Feel free to comment there, as well (mailto:<email address hidden>).
BTW, is mailing to <bug-number> @bugs.launchpad .net sufficient to add /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ qca/+bug/ 128505, so I wonder
comments to ubuntu bugs? I sent a Cc: of my last mail to
<email address hidden>, but it didn't yet show up on
https:/
if I missed something.