The problem is that an error was being reported incorrectly as a locking error. Why then were there no errors at all reported when I used "sudo apt-get upgrade"? Wouldn't there still have been an error reported by that command, just not a locking error?
The problem is that an error was being reported incorrectly as a locking error. Why then were there no errors at all reported when I used "sudo apt-get upgrade"? Wouldn't there still have been an error reported by that command, just not a locking error?