Comment 5 for bug 1818778

The systemtap dependency may be easier to handle this time around than last time: we've slightly changed the rules about build-dependencies:

https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2016-April/001179.html

Be sure to pay attention to this point:

> - If you have a build-dependency which does not result in a runtime
> dependency, but *does* result in code being copied into the final
> package, you must ensure that this code copying is declared using the
> Built-Using header[5]. (This is an uncommon case; the vast majority of
> the affected packages are written in go, where our package toolchain
> handles this automatically today.)

Thanks